Economics of Language: Rethinking Ethiopia’s multilingual future, harnessing human capital potential

 Fenet Jima Bedaso (PhD)

August 13, 2026

This Policy Briefing is published at Addis Standard.

Addis Abeba — Language policy has long been one of Ethiopia’s most contested political issues. Debates have rightly focused on linguistic rights, cultural recognition, and political representation. Communities speaking Afaan Oromoo, Somali, Tigrinya, Afar, and various Southern languages have consistently advocated for the right to use their native tongues in education, public service, and the workplace. Although Amharic remains the sole official working language at the federal level, calls persist to elevate these additional major languages to official federal working status. As the linguist Noam Chomsky once noted, the question of language is fundamentally a question of power, and that reality remains true today.

Yet something important is missing from this debate. Language is not only an element of identity or culture; it is also an economic resource that shapes employment outcomes, productivity, social mobility, trust among communities, and access to public services. For a country as linguistically diverse and as rapidly urbanizing as Ethiopia, ignoring this dimension has real consequences for economic opportunities.

Recent political debate has sharpened the stakes. In the campaign ahead of Ethiopia's seventh national election, opposition parties proposed introducing four or more working languages across all regions, including four or five languages in the Oromia region. At the federal level, expanding the number of recognized languages is a legitimate political goal.

At the regional level, however, multiplying working languages carries high economic costs: duplicated administration, expanded curriculum requirements, and greater demands on time and public resources. A more effective and more equitable approach would be to make the existing regional language, Afaan Oromoo, genuinely accessible to all residents of the region, regardless of their ethnic or socioeconomic background. That investment reduces costs while improving quality.

The economics of language is most applied to international migration studies, for example, how non-English-speaking immigrants fare in the United States or United Kingdom labor market, or how non-German speakers integrate economically in Germany. The evidence is consistent: language proficiency in the destination country improves earnings, occupational outcomes, and social integration, regardless of differences in labor market structure between North America and Europe. The same logic applies to internal migrants, cross-border seasonal workers, and regional residents who lack proficiency in the dominant regional language.

Internal migration in Ethiopia, both permanent and temporary, is a long-standing phenomenon, not a new one. A growing number of migrants move rural-to-urban, urban-to-rural, and across regions, driven by both push and pull factors. Understanding the socio-economic impact of internal migration on migrants and host populations, including the role of language in immigrants' economic integration, is essential. Examining the economic outcomes of internal migration falls outside this article's scope, but it warrants closer study in the Ethiopian labor market, particularly its push and pull factors and their effects on employment, the informal sector, decent work, and host communities.

Language as Human Capital: Economic benefits

In economics, language is treated as a form of human capital, an asset that individuals acquire through investments of time, money, and effort, and which generates returns in the labor market and in society more broadly. Language proficiency is a determinant of economic performance, influencing earnings, occupational attainment, and social integration. Like education or vocational training, language is not acquired passively; it requires deliberate investment, and its returns depend on the proficiency and market in which it is used.

The returns to acquiring a new language operate at both the individual and societal levels. For individuals, the most direct benefit is improved labour-market access. Workers who are proficient in the dominant language of a labour market can apply for a wider range of jobs, communicate their qualifications more effectively to employers, and advance more readily within organisations.

Beyond wages, language acquisition reduces the transaction costs involved in exchanging goods, services, and information. Evidence indicates that a shared language substantially increases bilateral trade flows by lowering the costs of communication, negotiation, and contract enforcement. At the individual level, the process translates into a greater ability to participate in markets, access credit, navigate public services, and engage with institutions. A migrant who acquires the regional language gains access to an economic ecosystem that was previously partially or wholly closed.

Language acquisition also generates non-market returns: improved access to information about job openings, health services, legal rights, government programmes, stronger community integration, and enhanced political participation. Each of these feeds back into economic outcomes. Workers with stronger social networks obtain jobs more efficiently, citizens who understand their rights are better placed to hold institutions accountable, and parents who can communicate with schools invest more effectively in their children's education.

At the societal level, a more linguistically integrated population reduces administrative costs, improves delivery of public services, and strengthens the internal cohesion of labour markets. In a country like Ethiopia, where internal migration is accelerating, the aggregate gains from broader language acquisition in productivity, market integration, and social trust could be substantial.

Economic costs of language acquisition

These benefits do not come free. Learning a language involves real costs that must be honestly accounted for in any policy discussion. The most visible are direct financial costs: tuition fees for language classes, learning materials, and, in some settings, examination and certification fees. For low-income households, which include most of Ethiopia's internal migrants, these costs can be prohibitive without public subsidy.

Equally important are opportunity costs. Learning a language takes time, and time spent studying is time not spent working, caring for children, or pursuing other productive activities. In their 2003 study, Barry R. Chiswick and Paul W. Miller note that opportunity costs are highest for workers already in employment, since they must learn during hours that would otherwise generate income. This means those who most need language skills, recent migrants in precarious employment, often face the greatest barriers to acquiring them.

Learning a language in adulthood is also cognitively demanding, and for many people it carries a dimension of cultural displacement, a sense that acquiring the dominant language comes at the expense of one's own. Evidence shows that linguistic distance between a learner's mother tongue and the target language significantly affects the speed and completeness of acquisition, meaning that speakers of languages structurally distant from the regional lingua franca face steeper learning curves and therefore higher effective costs.

Finally, there are systemic costs when language acquisition is left entirely to individuals. Markets tend to undersupply language education because many of its benefits reduced transaction costs, greater social cohesion, and broader labor-market participation accrue to society rather than solely to the learner. This market failure provides the clearest economic justification for public investment in language education: the private return is real but incomplete, and without intervention, acquisition rates will fall below the socially optimal level.

Ethiopia’s multilingual reality, economic potential

Ethiopia is one of the most culturally diverse countries, with more than 70 different languages, a diversity that is both a cultural asset and an economic opportunity. Research consistently shows that diverse societies generate productivity gains through the cross-pollination of ideas, broader market participation, and greater entrepreneurial variety. Addis Abeba offers vivid evidence of this. The city's ethnic economy, the constellation of culturally distinct goods, services, and businesses that migrants and regional communities have built, contributes meaningfully to employment and urban economic life. Shiro Meda, where artisans produce and sell traditional Ethiopian garments, is one of the more visible examples of how cultural identity and economic activity reinforce each other.

Equally illustrative is the proliferation of regionally distinctive restaurants across the capital: Oromo, Tigrayan, Somali, Gurage and Wolayta cuisines have each carved out markets in Addis Abeba, creating jobs for young people while sustaining language, culinary tradition, and cultural identity in an urban setting. The ethnic economy is not a curiosity; it is a productive sector.

The country's federal structure assigns regional governments significant authority over language policy. In Oromia, Afaan Oromoo is the working language of government and public institutions; in the Somali region, Somali prevails; Tigrinya governs in Tigray. This arrangement has legitimate cultural and political rationale: regional languages are not merely administrative conveniences but expressions of historically rooted identities that the federal system was partly designed to protect.

Yet the same arrangement generates economic friction as internal migration intensifies. Ethiopians move across regional boundaries in ever-larger numbers, driven by the search for employment, education, land, displacement, internal conflicts, and family connection. When they arrive in a new region, language barriers can prevent them from accessing public services, entering local labour markets, or participating in civic life. The result is a form of exclusion that is neither ethnic in intent nor economically neutral in effect and one that falls hardest on those who can least afford it.

Language Policy Trap: Rights vs barriers

There is nothing inherently wrong with requiring knowledge of a regional language for public employment or government services. Reasonable language requirements promote administrative efficiency and reflect democratic accountability to the local population. What is problematic is when such requirements are imposed without corresponding investment in accessible language-acquisition pathways.

In their study entitled “Bilingualism and Network Externalities,” Jeffrey Church and Ian King model this dilemma precisely in the context of bilingual economies: when the costs of language acquisition are borne entirely by individuals, and when those individuals lack access to affordable instruction, language requirements function as exclusionary barriers rather than job criteria. The burden falls disproportionately on those already disadvantaged, rural migrants, the poor, and speakers of minority languages.

Ethiopia's challenge is therefore not to choose between regional language promotion and economic inclusion. It is to pursue both simultaneously. Regional governments should invest in language education not only for school children, for whom instruction in local languages is both a right and a cognitive advantage in early learning, but also for adults, migrants, and workers who need accessible pathways to acquire regional language proficiency.

Lessons from multilingual countries

The international record on managing linguistic diversity offers useful lessons, though no model is directly transferrable to Ethiopia.

Canada's Official Languages Act established a framework in which both English and French enjoy state support, citizens can access government services in their preferred language, and language acquisition is publicly subsidised. Belgium's constitutional linguistic arrangements have carved the country into distinct language regions, with Dutch prevailing in Flanders and French in Wallonia. Both cases demonstrate that multilingualism can be institutionalised without sacrificing economic integration.

South Africa is perhaps the most structurally interesting case. Its constitution recognises eleven official languages, a plurality that mirrors Ethiopia's own diversity. In practice, however, labor-market dynamics have produced a clear hierarchy: English dominates formal employment, commerce, and professional life at the national level, while at the regional level Zulu shapes the KwaZulu-Natal labor market, Xhosa prevails in the Eastern Cape, Afrikaans retains strong market presence in the Western Cape, the Northern Cape and Northern Sotho and Tswana structure informal economic life across Limpopo and Northwest Province. The South African experience is instructive not as a model to be replicated, but as a reminder that constitutional recognition alone does not produce economic equality across languages; targeted investment in acquisition and access is required.

Closer to home, Rwanda's pragmatic shift to English as a medium of instruction alongside Kinyarwanda, partly driven by economic integration with East African Community partners, illustrates how language policy can be recalibrated to serve both identity and economic objectives. The lesson is not that Rwanda's specific choices should be replicated, but that deliberate policy design can produce better economic outcomes.

Recommendations: Language policy for inclusion, opportunity

Language policy, when executed effectively, can preserve Ethiopia's rich cultural heritage while expanding economic participation. Conversely, a policy that mandates language requirements without funding accessible instruction shifts the financial burden of a socially vital investment onto the individuals least equipped to bear it. That outcome is neither equitable nor economically viable.

First, governments must invest in adult language education. Even high-quality, school-based instruction serves only future generations. Millions of internal migrants and active members of the workforce require affordable, accessible adult language initiatives delivered through Kebele community programs, workplace schemes, and public-private partnerships.

Second, authorities must pair language requirements with acquisition opportunities. Whenever regional governments mandate language criteria for public employment or service access, they should concurrently provide subsidized training to prevent these mandates from becoming structural barriers to opportunity.

Third, federal multilingualism requires institutional strengthening. Amharic, Afaan Oromo, Tigrinya, Somali, and Afar should be fully operationalized as federal working languages. Rather than remaining aspirational statements in the constitution, this status must be backed by direct investment in multilingual public services, civil service training, and federal communications.

Furthermore, regional governments should invest in existing regional languages rather than multiplying official working tongues. Instead of establishing multiple working languages within a single region, local administrations ought to focus on making the primary regional language genuinely accessible to all residents, regardless of ethnic or socioeconomic background. In Oromia, for instance, this requires making Afaan Oromoo affordable and readily available to every resident.

In addition, policymakers need to systematically measure economic costs and benefits. Ethiopia currently lacks comprehensive data regarding the labor-market impact of its language policies. Conducting regular assessments using wage surveys, employment records, and service-access metrics will enable authorities to identify where language barriers impose the greatest economic toll and deploy targeted interventions accordingly.

Finally, public authorities should support private-sector language training. State resources alone cannot cover the full cost of instruction. Implementing tax incentives, standardized certification frameworks, and public co-funding for employer-led training programs will mobilize vital private investment across the sector.

Language policy, handled well, can reinforce Ethiopia's rich cultural heritage and broaden economic participation at the same time. A policy that promotes languages without investing in accessible acquisition shifts the full cost of a socially valuable investment onto the individuals least able to bear it. That is neither equitable nor economically efficient. AS

Editor’s Note: Fenet Jima Bedaso (PhD) is the founder of the Africa Development and Research Center (ADRC) and co-founder and senior researcher at Data Analytics for Practical Solution (DAPS), Oregon, USA. He can be reached at bedaso@adrc-oregon.org

Ethiopia Goes Viral With IShowSpeed, a Moment for Reflection

 Fenet Jima Bedaso (PhD)

January 20, 2026

Note: The revised version has been published at Ethiopia Insight

The livestream of IShowSpeed in Addis Ababa drew a level of global attention Ethiopia has rarely received in recent years. Until that moment, I had never heard of him. A closer look at his reach made clear why the broadcast mattered. 

He is one of the most influential figures in the contemporary digital ecosystem, and his presence in Ethiopia placed the country, briefly but unmistakably, at the center of a global online conversation. It was a reminder of how quickly digital visibility now travels, and how profoundly it can reshape perception.

I remember my first day working at a European research institute in Germany. During a coffee break, a colleague pursuing a PhD in legal studies approached me and said, “My parents still have a receipt from donating to famine relief in Ethiopia in 1977. Do you still have famine?”

Imagine hearing this on your very first day at work as the only Black researcher in the office while trying to navigate a new work environment. Over time, similar comments became routine whenever I traveled to Europe or North America. Some people asked whether Ethiopia even universities had, despite knowing that I was there on a full scholarship for a master’s degree.

For many African students in Western countries, such questions are normalized. Some people do not even know where Ethiopia is located. This is not just my story; I believe many Ethiopians share similar experiences. Western media has long portrayed Africa almost exclusively through war, famine, and drought. These narratives are deeply misleading because they show only one side of reality.

Social media matters. Africa deserves more than a single story. For decades, the world has known Ethiopia largely through images of famine and poverty. Today, social media offers a powerful alternative, allowing Ethiopians to tell their own stories, on their own terms. The world now sees how beautiful Addis Ababa is. That is something! 

****************************************************END***************************************************

The Economic Divided of the IShowSpeed Event

The economic value of the IShowSpeed visit is undeniable, mainly for two reasons.

Tourism and National Image

Ethiopia’s tourism sector was severely affected by COVID-19 and later by the Tigray war. This event sent a strong signal to the world that Ethiopia, at least Addis Ababa, is relatively peaceful and safe for international visitors.

One may argue otherwise, but the reality is simple: mass gatherings of that scale do not occur in the absence of basic security and if it is not peaceful. While it is too early to measure long-term tourism impacts, the resources spent on hosting this event were likely far lower than what Ethiopia would spend on global advertising campaigns.

For comparison, Rwanda reportedly paid over $100 million to Arsenal for an eight-year sleeve sponsorship to increase global visibility and boost tourism. The comparison is not perfect, but it is insightful when thinking about cost-effective image building.

Digital Infrastructure and Investment Signaling

The event also demonstrated Ethiopia’s capacity for digital connectivity, particularly in Addis Ababa. Reliable digital infrastructure is a prerequisite for attracting foreign direct investment, especially in banking, fintech, and service sectors. In this sense, the livestream functioned as real-time proof of digital readiness.

Despite these benefits, there are reasons for concern. My concerns go beyond this single event. It relates to the growing influence of social media, especially TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube on young people.

School Dropout Risks

In Ethiopia, students drop out of school for many well-documented reasons: poverty, distance to schools, conflict, and weak infrastructure. These are largely supply-side constraints. In this context, 4.5 million children of primary-school age and 2.7 million of secondary school students have dropped out of school in 2020.

However, evidence from international countries suggests that excessive social media use is associated with depression and poor mental health. Similar patterns may emerge in Ethiopia. Depression can lead to disengagement from education, increasing dropout risks.

Moreover, the visibility of “digital success” may encourage some youth to abandon schooling altogether in pursuit of TikTok or YouTube fame, despite the extremely low probability of sustained success.

Knowledge at Risk

When education is devalued in favor of short-term digital attention, human capital accumulation suffers. A simple example is reading. A generation that loses interest in books and deep learning faces long-term consequences for productivity, innovation, and long-term development.

Human Capital

In Ethiopia, only primary education is compulsory and free. According to World Bank estimates, the adult literacy rate is approximately 60 percent. This figure is substantially lower when disaggregated by region and gender, reflecting persistent inequalities in educational access and attainment. Expanding compulsory education to include secondary school should therefore be a central policy priority. Without such an expansion, increased digital participation risks widening existing inequalities rather than reducing them. I must acknowledge that while the expansion of mandatory schools is open for discussion, its intervention and implementation should be supported with empirical evidence. 

 Digital Literacy

Literacy rates in Ethiopia remain below the African average. Digital literacy must be integrated into school curricula alongside basic literacy. Young people need to learn not just how to use platforms, but how to critically engage with them.

Financial Literacy 

Financial literacy is foundational in the digital era. Many young people enter online platforms primarily in pursuit of economic gain, yet lack basic knowledge of income management, savings, taxation, and long-term financial sustainability. Without these skills, digital income is often fragile and short-lived.

Financial literacy, particularly discipline and long-term planning can help ensure income sustainability. Young people who spend most of their time on platforms such as TikTok or YouTube are less likely to invest in their human capital, which is essential for generating stable long-term income. Strong financial management skills, including budgeting, saving, and strategic planning, can therefore mitigate these risks and support more sustainable economic outcomes.

The Digital Divide: Gender and Geography

Digital access is neither free nor equality distributed. Women are less likely to own smartphones or access the internet, and rural communities lag far behind urban centers.

Closing this gap has proven economic and social benefits. Economically empowered women are more likely to raise healthier children, delay early marriage, and experience lower rates of domestic violence. Failure to address digital inequality will widen future inequality.

Language as Human Capital Investment

In economics, language is a form of human capital investment made based on expected returns. Language acquisition should not be viewed only as a means of communication, but as an investment with expected economic returns.

Research shows that multilingualism is associated with innovation, analytical thinking, and better academic outcomes. For this discussion, my interest is investment in the English language. In the social media era, English is a highly valued skill. Ignoring this reality is costly.

Language proficiency requirements vary by profession and sector. A lawyer, for example, needs advanced proficiency to analyze legal texts, while a salesperson requires functional skills to persuade consumers. The same applies to TikTokers, whose success in the digital economy depends on their ability to reach and engage global audiences.  Investing in English therefore expands visibility and income opportunities, making it a critical skill in today’s digital marketplace.

New Reality

To sum, Ethiopian youth are increasingly prioritizing economic opportunity over political negotiations that offer little or no direct economic return. For decades, political discourse has revolved around ethnic or nationalist redistribution of power, often detached from tangible economic outcomes for a rapidly growing youth population. 

As Yanis Varoufakis argues, we are moving toward a new form of capitalism technofeudalism where value is generated not through wage labor, but through algorithmic extraction. Unlike capitalism, users are not paid; instead, their data is extracted, analyzed, and monetized.

Similarly, Shoshana warns that these algorithms extract personal information not only for profit, but also to shape behavior posing and risks the struggle for democracy itself. Whether we like it or not, we are training the algorithms without compensation. Varoufakis calls us cloud serfs. 

Resisting artificial intelligence and the influence of social media is neither realistic nor desirable. The real question is how to capture economic gains while minimizing social harm.

Times have changed. We must acknowledge this shift and respond to it with policies that harness the digital economy while safeguarding education, equity, and long-term development.

The Economics of Beauty Premium in Ethiopia

Fenet Jima Bedaso (PhD)

May 18, 2025

My good friend Weyni Tesfai recently shared her personal experience on her YouTube channel, discussing how the dark legacy of slavery has left a lasting fingerprint on perceptions of skin tone and beauty. She spoke about how her children are perceived in Ethiopia and mentioned some of the unconscious questions she receives from people in Addis Ababa, such as why her children have curly hair.

After watching her video, I reflected on how definitions of beauty can lead to stereotyping individuals based on their physical appearance. Beyond social interactions, beauty can also have economic implications, particularly in the labor market. Physical appearance may influence hiring decisions, wages, and promotion opportunities, thereby contributing to inequality.

In economics, discrimination occurs when individuals with similar education, experience, and job-relevant characteristics receive different treatment based on attributes unrelated to productivity (Becker, 1957). One concept that helps explain this phenomenon is the beauty premium.

The beauty premium refers to the empirical observation that individuals who are considered physically attractive tend to have better employment prospects and earn higher wages than those considered less attractive. Numerous studies conducted in Western countries demonstrate that attractive workers receive higher wages and are more likely to be hired, even in occupations where appearance should not influence productivity (Mobius & Rosenblat, 2006; Doorley & Sierminska, 2015).

Some economists argue that attractive individuals may possess higher levels of confidence, which improves their interactions with employers and coworkers, thereby enhancing their labor market outcomes. However, the causal direction of this relationship is debated. It is equally plausible that preferential treatment toward attractive individuals contributes to increased confidence and better social outcomes, rather than confidence being an inherent trait associated with physical attractiveness (Mobius & Rosenblat, 2006).

What Is Beauty or Physical Attractiveness?

Although there is no universal definition of beauty, cultural consensus within a society often shapes shared perceptions of attractiveness. Economic research commonly measures physical attractiveness using facial photographs that are rated by evaluators on a numerical scale. For instance, participants may be asked to rate individuals on a scale from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent greater perceived attractiveness (Mobius & Rosenblat, 2006).

However, such measures are inherently subjective and reflect broader social biases. For example, in societies where European beauty standards dominate media representation, individuals with lighter skin tones or straighter hair may receive higher attractiveness ratings. In the United States, research has documented workplace discrimination based on hair texture and hairstyles associated with Black identity (Trusty et al., 2023).

These biases demonstrate that perceptions of beauty are socially constructed and often influenced by historical power structures, cultural norms, and media representation. Importantly, there is little evidence that physical attractiveness is systematically related to job performance.

Economic Theories Explaining the Beauty Premium

From an economic perspective, two major theories of discrimination help explain why physical attractiveness may influence labor market outcomes.

1. Taste-Based Discrimination

Gary Becker’s theory of taste-based discrimination suggests that employers, coworkers, or customers may have personal preferences that influence hiring decisions (Becker, 1957). According to this framework, employers may prefer to work with individuals they find more attractive and therefore discriminate against less attractive candidates.

As a result, less attractive individuals may be less likely to receive interview invitations and may face lower wage offers even when their productivity is identical to that of their more attractive counterparts. This form of discrimination contributes to wage inequality unrelated to human capital.

Empirical evidence supports the existence of such biases in hiring decisions. Studies have shown that individuals perceived as more attractive are more likely to receive positive responses from employers and may experience wage advantages throughout their careers (Doorley & Sierminska, 2015).

2. Statistical Discrimination

Another explanation is statistical discrimination, which occurs when employers rely on group stereotypes rather than evaluating individual productivity. Employers may use perceived correlations between certain characteristics and productivity when making hiring decisions.

In the context of beauty, employers might assume that attractive individuals possess stronger communication skills, greater confidence, or better customer-facing abilities. Even when these assumptions lack empirical support, they can influence hiring decisions.

For example, an employer may believe that attractive employees interact more effectively with clients and therefore favor them for customer-facing roles. In this case, discrimination occurs not necessarily because of personal dislike but because of stereotypes about the relationship between appearance and competence.

Beauty Standards and Discrimination in Ethiopia

In Ethiopia, beauty standards are shaped by a combination of historical, cultural, and global influences. Factors such as skin tone, facial features, and hair texture often influence perceptions of attractiveness.

Like many countries, Ethiopia’s diverse ethnic and cultural composition makes it difficult to establish a single universal definition of beauty. Standards may vary between rural and urban areas, as well as across ethnic groups and cultural contexts.

Nevertheless, there is often a socially recognized preference for lighter skin tones and certain facial features. These perceptions can also influence economic and social outcomes. For example, in some communities, brides perceived as physically attractive may command higher dowry payments, reflecting the economic value associated with beauty in the marriage market.

Media representation also plays a significant role in shaping beauty norms. Although Ethiopian media has recently begun portraying a wider range of skin tones, dominant beauty imagery still often favors long, straightened hair. Natural hairstyles and darker skin tones remain underrepresented.

Favoring lighter skin has a long history in Africa, with roots often linked to European colonialism. Colonial racial hierarchies associated lighter skin with power, wealth, and social status, shaping enduring beauty standards (Hunter, 2007; Glenn, 2008). Today, these norms continue to influence perceptions of beauty across Africa. One visible example is the growing use of skin-lightening products among young women, reflecting social pressures that associate lighter skin with attractiveness and upward mobility. These standards remain influential even in countries such as Ethiopia, which were never formally colonized, largely through Western media, global cultural exchange, and the legacy of Eurocentric aesthetics (Glenn, 2008; Hunter, 2007).

Conclusion

The economic advantages associated with beauty premium are well documented in academic research from developed economies. However, due to limited data and research infrastructure, the topic has received far less attention in developing countries, including Ethiopia.

Understanding the role of beauty in labor market outcomes is important because it highlights a subtle yet powerful form of discrimination. The beauty premium demonstrates how individuals with identical levels of education, skills, and productivity may experience unequal opportunities simply because of how they look.

 References

Becker, G. S. (1957). The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press.

Doorley, K., & Sierminska, E. (2015). Myth or fact? The beauty premium across the wage distribution in Germany. Economics Letters, 129, 29–34.

Mobius, M. M., & Rosenblat, T. S. (2006). Why beauty matters. American Economic Review, 96(1), 222–235.

Glenn, E. N. (2008). Yearning for lightness: Transnational circuits in the marketing and consumption of skin lighteners. Gender & Society, 22(3), 281–302.

Hunter, M. L. (2007). The persistent problem of colorism: Skin tone, status, and inequality. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 237–254.

Trusty, J., Ward, D. A., Good-Perry Ward, M., & He, M. (2023). Hair bias in the workplace: A critical human resource development perspective. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 25(1), 5–26.